Case 1400529/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Clay v 1 TWH Romsey Ltd 2 Romsey Hospitality Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400529/2020
- Decision date
- 18 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Clay
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Southampton before Employment Judge Reed, heard the matter on 28 October 2020. The claimant was Mrs C Clay, appearing in person. The first respondent was represented by Mr K Bryant QC and the second respondent by Mr T Cordrey.
The judgment records that the second respondent was dismissed from the proceedings. The substantive finding was that, on 30 September 2019, there had been a transfer of an undertaking from the first respondent.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment from the first respondent. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that there was, on 30 September 2019, a transfer of an undertaking from the first respondent, with the result that the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment from the first respondent. The second respondent was dismissed from the proceedings. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.