Case 1400535/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Calvert v ELP Facility Management Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400535/2020
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Calvert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent stated that it did not defend Mr K Calvert's claim. On the information before the Employment Judge, the tribunal found that ELP Facility Management Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The judgment records a single upheld claim for unlawful deduction from wages. No further reasoning, dispute of fact, or separate liability issues are set out in the extracted text beyond the tribunal's reliance on the claim form and the respondent's non-defence.
The respondent was ordered to pay Mr Calvert £541.86. No separate remedy components, interest, or additional awards are recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent stated that it did not defend the claim; the Employment Judge entered judgment on the basis of the claim form and the information before the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £542 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £542
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.