Case 1400536/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Stepien v WGC Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400536/2021
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Stepien
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims brought by Mr W Stepien against WGC Ltd. The judgment records that, by a letter dated 26 November 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations explaining why strike out should not occur and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claims were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not separately identify the pleaded claim types; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claims were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not separately identify the pleaded claim types; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claims were struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not separately identify the pleaded claim types; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.