Case 1400557/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Miss A Korovilas (2) Mr B Hodges v Zoe Poster — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400557/2020
- Decision date
- 12 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Miss A Korovilas (2) Mr B Hodges
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Livesey determined the claims on the papers. For Miss A Korovilas, the tribunal found that she had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the Respondent to pay damages of £1,400.00 net. The tribunal also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded her a redundancy payment of £5,500.00.
For Mr B Hodges, the tribunal made the same two findings. It held that he was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,626.90 net. It also found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded him a redundancy payment of £6,643.17. The total monetary outcome recorded by the judgment is £15,170.07.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Miss A Korovilas: dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded in the net sum of £1,400.00. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
| Redundancy | Miss A Korovilas: dismissed by reason of redundancy; redundancy payment awarded of £5,500.00. | Upheld | — | £5,500 |
| Breach of contract | Mr B Hodges: dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded in the net sum of £1,626.90. | Upheld | — | £1,627 |
| Redundancy | Mr B Hodges: dismissed by reason of redundancy; redundancy payment awarded of £6,643.17. | Upheld | — | £6,643 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,170
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.