Case 1400558/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Gruszczynska v Shelley Park Neuro Care Centre — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400558/2022
- Decision date
- 11 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Dates
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Gruszczynska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 5 April 2023, the Tribunal gave Mrs A Gruszczynska an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why her complaint of discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief should not be struck out. The Tribunal recorded that the claim was not established by a tick in the box, lacked particulars, had no reasonable prospect of success, and that the claimant had provided no grounds for it. It also noted non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 6 April 2022 in respect of the religion or belief claim and the claim for other payments, and that the claims had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The complaint was struck out after the Tribunal found it was not established by a tick in the box without particulars, had no reasonable prospect of success, the claimant had provided no grounds, there had been non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 6 April 2022, and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.