Case 1400559/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Georgia Rose Residential Care Ltd and Firbank Residential Care Home — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400559/2022
- Decision date
- 22 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Le Grys
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Bristol by video on 10 June 2022, the Second Respondent was removed as a party with the Claimant’s consent. The First and Second Respondents did not attend. Employment Judge Le Grys gave judgment orally, with the written record sent to the parties on 22 June 2022.
The tribunal found that the Claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against the First Respondent was well founded and ordered payment of £941 gross. It also found that the Claimant’s breach of contract claim, based on failure to provide the required notice of termination of employment, was well founded, but made no separate award for that claim.
The tribunal further found that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed by the First Respondent. It awarded £5,395.19 net in addition to the wages award. That sum comprised a basic award of £4,238.50, including a 25% uplift for failure to comply with the ACAS code, a compensatory award of £656.69, also including a 25% uplift, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The total payable under the judgment was therefore £6,336.19.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as a gross sum of £941. | Upheld | — | £941 |
| Breach of contract | Found well founded for failure to provide the required notice of termination of employment, but no separate award was made. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Awarded as a net sum of £5,395.19, comprising a basic award of £4,238.50, a compensatory award of £656.69, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The basic and compensatory awards each included a 25% uplift for failure to comply with the ACAS code. | Upheld | — | £5,395 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,336
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,239
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £657
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS code
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.