Case 1400560/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Sanders v Douglas Logistics Ltd (formerly Utterly Rawsome Ltd) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400560/2024
- Decision date
- 24 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woodhead Appearances
- Venue
- by CVP from the Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Sanders
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent heard by CVP from Bristol on 31 January 2025 before Employment Judge Woodhead. The parties agreed that Douglas Logistics Ltd, formerly Utterly Rawsome Ltd, was the correct respondent and the Claimant's employer. The Claimant agreed she was not employed by Mr B Glendinning or Utterlicious Ltd, and the claims against them were dismissed on withdrawal.
The Claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was also dismissed on withdrawal. The separate holiday pay complaint was agreed to be well-founded: the Respondent accepted that it had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but untaken when employment ended. The parties agreed that the Respondent would pay £322 gross in respect of that complaint, with the Claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The parties further agreed that the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 in the sum of £774.38. The judgment records no contested factual findings or reasons beyond the parties' consent terms, and the aggregate monetary total recorded from the agreed sums is £1,096.38.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Claimant agreed she was not employed by Mr B Glendinning or Utterlicious Ltd, so the claims against them were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Respondent agreed the holiday pay complaint was well-founded and that it had made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. The agreed sum was stated to be gross. | Upheld | — | £322 |
| Redundancy | The parties agreed the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £774 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,096
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.