Case 1400565/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Langton v Amdocs Systems Group Limited Heard in chambers on 28 January 2025 at Bristol and on the papers — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400565/2020
- Decision date
- 24 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Langton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 28 January 2025, Employment Judge Bax sat in chambers at Bristol and on the papers and recorded a judgment by consent. The parties had agreed remedy on the unlawful deductions from wages claim, and the judgment also noted that a sum of £6,361.46 had already been entered on 6 November 2024 in respect of the ACAS uplift.
The tribunal ordered Amdocs Systems Group Limited to pay Mr J Langton £75,764.18 gross in respect of the well-founded unlawful deductions from wages claim. No further factual findings, legal reasoning, or separate remedies are set out in the extracted text beyond the consent order and the earlier uplift figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent on remedy. The tribunal recorded that a judgment in the sum of £6,361.46 had already been entered on 6 November 2024 in respect of the ACAS uplift. | Upheld | — | £75,764 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £82,126
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.