Case 1400575/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Ross v Mr Aubrey Wood T/a The Royal Oak WUE — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400575/2019
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harper MBE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Ross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 6 January 2020, the Tribunal gave Mrs C Ross an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 21 November 2019 and had not replied to the Tribunal's correspondence dated 6 January 2020.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Harper MBE ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 21 November 2019, did not reply to the Tribunal's correspondence dated 6 January 2020, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.