Case 1400582/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Chambers v Shire Oak Energy Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400582/2023
- Decision date
- 7 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Chambers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 2 February 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge made a Rule 21 determination. On that basis, the tribunal proceeded to decide the claim on the papers.
The tribunal found that the claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction from pay in respect of unpaid wages from 1 June 2022 until 31 December 2022. It awarded £5,955.51 gross for that unpaid wages claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been wrongfully dismissed and was entitled to notice pay. It awarded 12 weeks, described in the judgment as 3 months, notice pay in the sum of £9,460.51 net.
All other claims were dismissed. The judgment does not record any separate allocation of the sums beyond the two amounts awarded for unpaid wages and notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found an unlawful deduction from pay for failure to pay wages from 1 June 2022 to 31 December 2022. The sum awarded was £5,955.51 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,956 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment found that the claimant had been wrongfully dismissed and was entitled to notice pay. The sum awarded was 12 weeks' notice pay of £9,460.51 net. | Upheld | — | £9,461 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,416
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.