Case 1400583/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Brian Morgan v High-Tech Windows Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400583/2023
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Brian Morgan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Brian Morgan, had been employed by High-Tech Windows Ltd from 16 July 1990 until he was summarily dismissed on 24 October 2022 by reason of redundancy. The Secretary of State accepted that the dismissal was for redundancy and that statutory redundancy pay, notice pay and holiday pay had already been paid. The claimant sought a protective award on the basis that there had been no consultation and that more than 20 employees were involved.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that 21 employees were affected, that they were all employed at one place, that they were told they were to be dismissed by reason of redundancy, that there was no consultation with him, that there was no employee representative or recognised trade union, and that there were no special circumstances. On that basis it held that he was entitled to a protective award and fixed the protected period as commencing on 24 October 2022.
The tribunal awarded 90 days' pay and recorded that the claimant's weekly pay had been agreed at £505. The separate claims against Britannia Windows UK Ltd were settled during the hearing and were to be dismissed 21 days later if the settlement terms were implemented.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award of 90 days' pay against the first respondent. The tribunal accepted that there had been no consultation, no employee representative or recognised trade union, no special circumstances, and that the protected period commenced on 24 October 2022. The weekly pay agreed for the claimant was £505. | Upheld | — | £6,493 |
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying claim types against the second respondent. The parties agreed terms of settlement during the hearing, and the claims were to be dismissed 21 days after 25 August 2023 if the settlement was implemented. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,493
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.