Case 1400591/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Clement v The Sports Project CIC — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400591/2023
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Clement
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 31 January 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Cadney Date decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Mr H Clement’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,140 gross in unpaid wages and £270.75 for incurred expenses.
The total award was £1,410.75.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal made a rule 21 determination and found unauthorised deductions from wages, ordering payment of £1,140 gross unpaid wages and £270.75 for incurred expenses. | Upheld | — | £1,411 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,411
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.