Case 1400609/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Amy Yeates v GT Plumbing & Heating Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400609/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Amy Yeates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms Amy Yeates, brought claims against GT Plumbing & Heating Limited. The tribunal recorded that the complaints of discrimination on grounds of age and marriage or civil partnership were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant, so those claims did not proceed to a substantive merits determination.
The complaint of constructive dismissal was dismissed because the claimant did not have the necessary two years' service at the time the employment ended. The judgment does not record any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination recorded. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination recorded. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have the necessary two years' service at the time the employment ended. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.