Case 1400609/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Jennie Shearing v AND Mr Ross Sanders and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400609/2023
- Decision date
- 26 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss Jennie Shearing
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the matter under Rule 21 in chambers at Plymouth on 26 July 2023 after no valid response had been presented. It found that Longhorn Pubs Limited, not Mr Ross Sanders, was the correct respondent to the claimant's claims, and Mr Sanders was dismissed as a respondent.
The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded for two weeks' pay covering 25 October 2022 to 4 November 2022. The tribunal assessed the gross sum at £1,076.92, gave credit for £572.93 already received, and ordered Longhorn Pubs Limited to pay the balance of £503.99.
The claimant's accrued but unpaid holiday pay claim also succeeded. The tribunal ordered Longhorn Pubs Limited to pay eight days' pay in the gross sum of £861.54. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or any other head of loss, and it cancelled the hearing listed for 27 July 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held this claim succeeded in respect of two weeks' pay from 25 October 2022 to 4 November 2022. The gross sum was £1,076.92, and the claimant was given credit for £572.93 already received. | Upheld | — | £504 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to accrued but unpaid holiday pay and ordered payment of eight days' pay in the gross sum of £861.54. | Upheld | — | £862 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,366
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.