Case 1400610/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v House & Home Services Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400610/2023
- Decision date
- 22 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 2 February 2023. House and Home Services Limited did not present a valid response in time, so Employment Judge Roper determined the claims under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing.
The judgment upheld the recorded claims for Lewis Mallon, Vicky Waters, Dan Olver, Aimee Evans and Jack Abbott and made monetary awards for unlawful deductions from wages, notice pay in breach of contract where claimed, redundancy pay where claimed, and holiday pay. For Lewis Mallon, the tribunal awarded £3,330 gross for unlawful deductions, £1,215 for breach of contract notice pay, £1,142 redundancy pay and £1,969.28 holiday pay, totalling £7,656.28. For Vicky Waters, it awarded £4,000 gross for unlawful deductions, £1,713 redundancy pay and £2,769.24 holiday pay; the notice-damages figure is not preserved clearly in the extracted text, and the judgment states a total of £8,482.24.
For Dan Olver, the tribunal awarded £4,421.62 gross for unlawful deductions and £1,716 holiday pay; the redundancy figure is not preserved clearly in the extracted text, and the judgment states a total of £6,137.62. For Aimee Evans, the tribunal awarded £2,499.99 gross for unlawful deductions, £1,142 redundancy pay and £2,423.06 holiday pay; the notice-damages figure is not preserved clearly in the extracted text, and the judgment states a total of £6,065.05. For Jack Abbott, the tribunal awarded £1,833.33 gross for unlawful deductions, £423.08 for breach of contract notice pay and £846.16 holiday pay, totalling £3,102.57.
Claims and outcomes
18 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,330 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,215 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,142 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,969 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,000 |
| Breach of contract | Notice-damages award recorded, but the extracted text shows the amount only as "£NNNN"; case total stated as £8,482.24. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,713 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £31,444
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.