Case 1400617/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Leamon v Knight Polson Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400617/2023
- Decision date
- 6 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Leamon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 2 February 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal determined that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages, had dismissed the claimant by reason of redundancy, and had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered payment of £4,145.51 gross for unlawful deductions from wages, £11,991.00 as a redundancy payment, and £2,128.47 in respect of holiday entitlement.
The judgment states that the total payable to the claimant was £18,264.98. No separate findings, legal tests, or additional remedy elements are set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £4,145.51 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,146 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £11,991.00. | Upheld | — | £11,991 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,128.47. | Upheld | — | £2,128 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,265
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.