Case 1400618/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Ruban v British Study Centres Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400618/2020
- Decision date
- 2 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms N Ruban
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondents did not attend the hearing. It held that the claimant's claims for breach of contract and unpaid holiday pay succeeded against the First Respondent, awarding £3,000 for breach of contract and £461.54 for holiday pay.
The claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages relating to unpaid overtime was dismissed. The claims against the Second Respondent were also dismissed. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally, subject to any request within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The award was made against the First Respondent. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Holiday pay | The award was made against the First Respondent. | Upheld | — | £462 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint related to unpaid overtime. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,462
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.