Case 1400621/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Glaucia Pereira v Methods Business and Digital Technology Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400621/2022
- Decision date
- 27 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oldroyd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Glaucia Pereira
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Exeter Employment Tribunal hearing on 15 July 2025, before Employment Judge Oldroyd, the Claimant's application to amend was granted. The judgment states that the Claimant is entitled to rely upon the "Further Particulars of Protected Disclosure" served on 15 June 2025.
The extracted text does not record a substantive determination of liability on any whistleblowing or other claim, and it does not set out any remedy. It is a short procedural judgment only.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless a party requests them within 14 days of the sending of the record of decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The extracted judgment does not determine the substantive protected disclosure claim; it records only that the Claimant's application to amend was granted and that she could rely on the Further Particulars of Protected Disclosure served on 15 June 2025. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.