Case 1400622/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Caudwell, Claimant’s Husband v Bright Hospitality Operations Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400622/2020
- Decision date
- 28 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Caudwell, Claimant’s Husband
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Bright Hospitality Operations Limited was the correct respondent to Mrs M Caudwell's claim. It dismissed the Second and Third Respondents as respondents from the proceedings. The hearing took place at Plymouth on 28 September 2020, with the respondents not attending because the joint response had been struck out.
The claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay 104.5 hours' pay in the gross sum of £928.95. No separate breakdown of the award was recorded beyond that gross sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that Bright Hospitality Operations Limited was the correct respondent to the claimant's claim. The Second and Third Respondents were dismissed as respondents from the proceedings. | Upheld | — | £929 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £929
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.