Case 1400638/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Vohkus Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400638/2022
- Decision date
- 16 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ben Stratford was employed by Vohkus Limited from 1 September 2019 as a Service Delivery Manager and was summarily dismissed for alleged misconduct on 10 December 2021. The tribunal heard the remedy issues remotely on 5 August 2022. It found that he had been unfairly dismissed and that his breach of contract claim succeeded in respect of his three months' contractual notice. The claimant did not seek reinstatement or re-engagement.
On remedy, the tribunal accepted that the claimant's net weekly pay with the respondent was £817.19, made up of net pay and pension contributions. It found that he obtained alternative employment on 17 February 2022 at a lower salary of £40,000 per year, with a net weekly pay of £593.84 and a weekly loss of £223.35. The tribunal awarded £8,171.90 for the 10 weeks between dismissal and the start of the new job, £5,360.40 for the 24 weeks to the hearing, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. It also awarded £5,807.10 for 26 weeks of future loss, saying the claimant's request for two years' future loss was too speculative.
The basic award was £1,088.00, giving total compensation for unfair dismissal of £20,927.40. The tribunal recorded that the notice-loss element had already been compensated within the unfair dismissal award, so no separate breach of contract award was made. It also found that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded total compensation for unfair dismissal of £20,927.40, made up of a basic award and compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £20,927 |
| Breach of contract | The claim succeeded in respect of three months' contractual notice, but no separate award was made because that loss had already been compensated within the unfair dismissal award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,927
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,088
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £19,839
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.