Case 1400643/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Leshai Robinson v HCB Trading Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400643/2023
- Decision date
- 21 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray-Jones Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Leshai Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP at Bristol on 21 July 2023 before Employment Judge Gray-Jones. The tribunal found that HCB Trading Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Miss Robinson's wages and ordered it to pay £690.95 gross. It also found that, on termination, the respondent had not paid accrued outstanding annual leave and ordered £264.38 gross for holiday pay.
The tribunal upheld the breach of contract complaint concerning non-payment for the days worked during the notice period, but made no separate damages award because that sum was already covered by the award made in the unauthorised deductions complaint. The extracted judgment text states that the wage deductions ran from 14 October 2022 until 28 October 2023.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had not issued a written statement of particulars of employment during the claimant's employment. It therefore made an award under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 in the amount of two weeks' pay, namely £694.54. The total award was £1,649.87.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found unauthorised deductions from wages from 14 October 2022 until 28 October 2023 as stated in the extracted text, and ordered payment of £690.95 gross. | Upheld | — | £691 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that no payment had been made on termination in respect of accrued outstanding annual leave and ordered £264.38 gross. | Upheld | — | £264 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the notice-period wages claim but stated there was no separate award because the sum claimed was already covered by the unauthorised deductions award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The respondent had not issued a written statement of particulars of employment; the tribunal made an award under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 equivalent to 2 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £695 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,650
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.