Case 1400647/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L McClelland v Blade Motor Cycles Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400647/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
- Panel members
- Mr H Launder, Mr H Beese
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L McClelland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Bristol by video on 10, 11, 12 and 13 May 2021 before Employment Judge Midgley, with Mr H Launder and Mr H Beese as the lay members. It heard Mr L McClelland's claims against Blade Motor Cycles Limited under sections 15 and 20 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal's unanimous decision was that both discrimination claims were not well founded and were dismissed. The judgment does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless separately requested. The judgment was sent to the parties on 20 May 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s.15 Equality Act 2010; dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s.20 Equality Act 2010; dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.20 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.