Case 1400647/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Critcher v South Coast Foods Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400647/2022
- Decision date
- 18 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Ms C Lloyd-Jennings, Mr N Knight
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Critcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing heard at Southampton on 20, 21, 23, 24, 28, 29 and 30 November 2023, the tribunal comprised Employment Judge Self with Ms C Lloyd-Jennings and Mr N Knight. The claimant was represented by Mr R Johnstone and the respondent by Mr D Brown counsel.
The tribunal held that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also held that all claims of disability discrimination were not well-founded and dismissed them. The judgment does not identify any monetary award, and none is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal stated that all claims of disability discrimination were not well-founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.