Case 1400653/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr McKee (Claimants Husband) For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400653/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton in person
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr McKee (Claimants Husband) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 12 December 2019, Employment Judge Rayner considered the claimant's complaint of direct sex discrimination numbered 12J in the case management order of EJ Salter dated 30 September 2019. The allegation was that in August 2018 four members of the respondent's staff targeted the claimant and others and began playing pranks on mainly women.
That complaint was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success under rule 37. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims were not determined at this hearing and remained listed for hearing on 7 to 11 September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Complaint 12J in the case management order of EJ Salter dated 30 September 2019. The allegation was that in August 2018 four members of the respondent's staff targeted the claimant and others and began playing pranks on mainly women. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.