Case 1400654/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Dus v First West of England Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400654/2022
- Decision date
- 28 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oliver Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr T Dus
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter at Bristol on 24-25 October 2022 before Employment Judge Oliver. The Claimant, Mr T Dus, appeared in person. The First Respondent was represented by Mr C Riley, solicitor, and the Second Respondent by Mr T Brennan, representative.
The tribunal found that the First Respondent was not the Claimant's employer at the time he was dismissed. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim against the First Respondent was struck out because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it.
The unfair dismissal claim against the Second Respondent was considered and failed. The judgment records that this claim was dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The First Respondent was found not to be the Claimant's employer at the time of dismissal, so the unfair dismissal claim against it was struck out for want of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim against the Second Respondent failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.