Case 1400661/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Woodward v Incept Solutions Ltd and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400661/2023
- Decision date
- 19 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr B Woodward
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the South West Employment Tribunals on 8 February 2023. The respondents did not present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Against Incept Solutions Ltd, the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded the claimant £2,692.32 gross. It also found that the First Respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £531.06, making the total payable by the First Respondent £3,223.38.
Against Aviate By Incept, the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded £4,038.48 gross. It also found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £288.46, making the total payable by the Second Respondent £4,326.94.
The claims against Thomas Whiting were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment records a combined total award of £7,550.32 across the two respondent companies.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The First Respondent, Incept Solutions Ltd, made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £2,692 |
| Holiday pay | The First Respondent, Incept Solutions Ltd, failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £531 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Second Respondent, Aviate By Incept, made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £4,038 |
| Holiday pay | The Second Respondent, Aviate By Incept, failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £288 |
| Other | The claims against the Third Respondent, Thomas Whiting, were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,550
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.