Case 1400669/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Pryor by telephone v Mr McCain, solicitor, by telephone — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400669/2023
- Decision date
- 31 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Boyce Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Pryor by telephone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on 15 August 2023 before Employment Judge Boyce sitting at Bristol via BT Meet Me. The claimant, Mrs Sara Pryor, appeared by telephone and the respondent, Developing Health and Independence (DHI), was represented by Mr McCain, solicitor, by telephone.
The judgment records a single operative order: the claimant's claim was struck out. The text does not set out the underlying cause of action, any pleaded facts, or the specific reason for striking out. It states that full oral reasons were given at the hearing.
The judgment also states that any party seeking written reasons had to apply by email to the tribunal within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. No monetary award, liability finding, or substantive remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying legal claim; it states only that the claimant's claim was struck out. Full oral reasons were given at the hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.