Case 1400684/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Gurung v Ministry of Defence — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400684/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Gurung
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the complaint of disability discrimination. It recorded that the claimant had not complied with an Unless Order requiring him to provide a disability impact statement by 11 August 2022, that the respondent had applied for strike out, and that the claimant had not commented on that application as directed.
The claimant did not make written representations, sufficient representations, or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 25 August 2022. The Tribunal concluded that the disability discrimination claims, and claims relying on the conditions said to be disabilities, were no longer being actively pursued and were also struck out for breach of case management orders.
The judgment expressly stated that the claimant's remaining claims remained listed for hearing on 18 January 2023; those claims were not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the complaint of disability discrimination and claims relying on conditions said to be disabilities. It records that the claimant's remaining claims remained listed for hearing on 18 January 2023 and were not determined in this judgment. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.