Case 1400691/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Anwar (Bristol Law Centre Representative) For the v Mr C Baker (Solicitor) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400691/2019
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Anwar (Bristol Law Centre Representative) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss E Sampson brought claims of discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments against NHS Blood and Transplant. The hearing in this judgment was concerned with whether she was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time. The tribunal recorded that the Respondent accepted the long-term element if impairment and substantial adverse effect were established.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | This judgment determined a preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that at the material time the claimant was disabled by reason of anxiety and depression, but it did not decide substantive liability for the underlying discrimination arising from disability and reasonable adjustments complaints in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- Equality Act 2010 s.6 and Schedule 1
- Richmond Adult Community College v McDougall
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Morgan v Staffordshire University
- Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Morris
- Ministry of Defence v Hay
- Leonard v Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.