Case 1400691/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Calder v Bowlers Restaurant Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400691/2022
- Decision date
- 3 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Calder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss T Calder succeeded in her claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against Bowlers Restaurant Limited. The tribunal found that, although she was paid monthly in arrears and had no regular pay date, the respondent did not pay all wages due for September 2021 and October 2021.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had not paid the claimant for holiday accrued but untaken on termination of employment. On the figures set out in the judgment, 10 weeks were worked between 13 August 2021 and 24 October 2021, annual leave accrued at the rate of one week, and after taking 0.2 weeks during employment, 0.2 weeks remained untaken. Using an average weekly pay of £167.40, the tribunal calculated the holiday element at £33.48.
The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £555.48, made up of £63 for underpaid wages in September 2021, £459 for unpaid wages in October 2021, and £33.48 for untaken annual leave on termination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found one unlawful deduction from wages claim, made up of underpaid wages for September 2021 and October 2021, plus pay for annual leave accrued but untaken on termination. | Upheld | — | £555 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £555
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.