Case 1400695/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kieran Williams v AND Heartlands Trust (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400695/2024
- Decision date
- 7 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kieran Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJudgment was issued under Rule 21 following the respondent's failure to present a valid response within the required time. The hearing was held in chambers at Plymouth on 28 November 2024 before Employment Judge N J Roper, with judgment sent to the parties on 7 January 2025.
The tribunal found the claimant entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,113.30, calculated as 4.5 weeks' pay at £247.40 per week gross. The tribunal also found the claimant's breach of contract claim well founded, the claimant having been dismissed without notice on 31 January 2024, and ordered the respondent to pay six weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £1,484.40.
The claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment of 4.5 weeks' pay at £247.40 per week gross. | Upheld | — | £1,113 |
| Breach of contract | Claimant dismissed without notice on 31 January 2024; six weeks' notice pay awarded in net sum. | Upheld | — | £1,484 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,598
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.