Case 1400703/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Limoine v Ms R Sharma — 2018
- Case reference
- 1400703/2018
- Decision date
- 2 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Limoine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short hearing heard on 26 October 2018 before Employment Judge Wright. No evidence was heard. The claimant had presented a breach of contract claim, and the respondent presented an employer's contract claim, which the tribunal had already accepted. The claimant was told to respond within 28 days if she wished to contest the employer's claim, but no out-of-time response was made after Miss Jagroo became involved in June or July 2018.
The tribunal stated that the respondent sought £1,970.00 by way of the employer's contract claim. It granted default judgment in the respondent's favour on that claim. The tribunal then accepted the respondent's sensible agreement to offset the claimant's claim of £685.00, leaving £1,285.00 payable to the respondent.
In light of that offset and the absence of evidence, the tribunal said it was not in accordance with the overriding objective to hear evidence on the claimant's claim, and the claimant's claim was dismissed. The judgment records no other remedy, and the bottom-line sum ordered was £1,285.00 payable by the claimant to the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant's breach of contract claim was dismissed after the tribunal accepted the respondent's employer's contract claim and applied an offset. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's employer's contract claim succeeded. The tribunal noted that the respondent sought £1,970.00 and that the claimant's £685.00 claim was set off against that sum, leaving £1,285.00 payable by the claimant to the respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,285 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,285
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.