Case 1400711/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F MacKenzie v Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400711/2020
- Decision date
- 10 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
- Panel members
- Mr J Ruddick, Mr R Spry-Shute
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F MacKenzie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr F MacKenzie’s claims against Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust at Bristol by video on 16 to 19 May 2022, before Employment Judge Livesey sitting with Mr J Ruddick and Mr R Spry-Shute. The written record states that the claimant’s discrimination complaints were dismissed.
The extracted judgment text does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasons. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
No monetary award is recorded in the written decision. On the material provided, the only adjudicated outcome is dismissal of the discrimination claim(s).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment text states that the claimant's complaints of discrimination were dismissed. The specific protected characteristic is not stated in the extracted text itself, but the case listing identifies the claim as disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.