Case 1400726/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Langner v Nexus Mediacom Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400726/2019
- Decision date
- 11 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harper MBE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Langner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent had not presented a response to the claims and proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the judgment states that the claims of unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, maternity discrimination and wages due succeed.
No separate findings on liability, remedy, or quantum are set out in this short judgment. The case was left listed for a Telephone Case Management Preliminary hearing on 3 October 2019, and no monetary award is recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment uses the phrase 'wages due' rather than a more specific statutory label. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.