Case 1400742/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Chapman v The Dower House Nursing Home LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400742/2022
- Decision date
- 30 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Craft
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mrs J Killick, Mr M Richardson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Chapman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Southampton before Employment Judge Craft with Mrs J Killick and Mr M Richardson, gave a unanimous judgment dismissing both of the Claimant's protected disclosure claims. The claims were brought under s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996, alleging automatically unfair dismissal, and s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996, alleging detriment for making protected disclosures.
The written record states only the outcome and does not set out the tribunal's reasons, findings of fact, or any remedy assessment. No monetary award was made or recorded in the judgment. The decision was sent to the parties on 30 November 2023, with oral reasons having been given at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim under s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996 (automatically unfair dismissal for protected disclosures). | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim under s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996 (detriment for making protected disclosures). | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.