Case 1400750/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Ormsby v Cheltenham Regency Hotel and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400750/2020
- Decision date
- 21 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss L Ormsby
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a Rule 21 judgment dated 21 May 2020, Employment Judge Livesey found for Miss L Ormsby on all of the claims recorded in the judgment against Cheltenham Regency Hotel, Clough North Ltd and Bright Hospitality Operations Ltd. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,728.21 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £328.40 net in damages. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £229.88 gross. The combined monetary award recorded by the judgment is £2,286.49.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,728.21. | Upheld | — | £1,728 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £328.40 net. | Upheld | — | £328 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £229.88 gross. | Upheld | — | £230 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,286
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.