Case 1400761/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Wooldridge v Botleigh Grange Hotel Ltd (In Administration) Botleigh Grange Limited (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400761/2019
- Decision date
- 26 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Wooldridge
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment only. The tribunal recorded that the respondent company was in administration and that neither the Administrator's consent nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 11 May 2020 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
For those reasons, the tribunal struck out the claim. There was no merits determination and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not state the underlying claim type, but the GOV.UK listing for this case identifies it as an unlawful deduction from wages case. The tribunal did not determine the merits; it struck the claim out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.