Case 1400765/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs T Yordanova v Graduate Landscapes Ltd — 2018

Case reference: 1400765/2018
Decision date: 13 December 2018
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Livesey Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs T Yordanova

Respondent

Graduate Landscapes Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant’s discrimination complaint was clarified as being on the grounds of marriage or civil partnership, following further particulars filed on 30 May 2018 and discussion at a hearing on 11 July 2018. The judgment concerns only that complaint, not the merits of any wider liability issues.

At a further preliminary hearing on 31 October 2018, Employment Judge Livesey ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £250 in respect of the discrimination complaint. The order was sent to the claimant on 5 November 2018.

The claimant did not pay the deposit. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaint under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 5 and 6 August 2019 remained as listed.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Marriage or civil partnership discrimination	The complaint was clarified as discrimination on the grounds of marriage or civil partnership. At a preliminary hearing on 31 October 2018, the tribunal ordered a deposit of £250 in respect of that complaint. The deposit was not paid, so the claim was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.	Struck out	Marriage / civil partnership	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.