Case 1400778/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Jabang v Elite Security Manned Guarding Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400778/2019
- Decision date
- 19 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mr H Launder, Ms L Simpson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Jabang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Bristol on 5 to 9 July 2021, with 8 and 9 July by video, before Employment Judge Livesey with Mr H Launder and Ms L Simpson. The claimant, Mr M Jabang, was represented by counsel and the respondent, Elite Security Manned Guarding Ltd, was also represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant’s complaints of race discrimination, detriment under s. 45A of the Employment Rights Act, and unfair dismissal were all dismissed. No monetary award is recorded.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so written reasons were not provided unless requested. On the material extracted text, no further findings of fact or legal analysis are set out beyond the dismissals.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers to detriment under s. 45A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.