Case 1400779/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Versant Developments & Homes Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400779/2022
- Decision date
- 7 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Smail, sitting alone at Exeter by video on 25 August 2022, recorded that Ms J. Turner had been dismissed for redundancy without notice on 31 August 2021. The respondent did not appear. The judgment does not set out any disputed liability findings beyond the fact of the dismissal and the monetary consequences that followed.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay notice pay of £1,666.66 gross, accrued but untaken holiday pay of £828.60 gross, and a redundancy payment of £2,307.66, described in the judgment as 4 x 1.5 x 384.61. The total amount ordered was £4,802.92, payable forthwith.
No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or whistleblowing issues are recorded in the judgment text provided, and no separate legal test is cited. The determination is a short monetary judgment arising from the redundancy dismissal and the associated contractual and statutory payments.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded after the tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed for redundancy without notice on 31 August 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday pay was awarded as part of the tribunal's monetary judgment. | Upheld | — | £829 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded a redundancy payment calculated in the judgment as 4 x 1.5 x 384.61. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,803
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.