Case 1400786/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Murphy v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400786/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Murphy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent conceded that it had unlawfully deducted £1,622.40 from the claimant's wages in breach of s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 for the claim under case number 1400786/2020.
The tribunal made a declaration to that effect and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,622.40 pursuant to s.24 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment recorded that the claimant's separate unlawful deduction claim concerning overtime/TPM allowance remained listed for hearing on 22 and 23 February 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent conceded an unlawful deduction from wages for the claim in question. The judgment states a separate unlawful deduction claim in respect of overtime/TPM allowance remained listed for a later hearing, so it is not treated as adjudicated here. | Upheld | — | £1,622 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,622
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.24 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.