Case 1400786/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Ms J Von Weichardt — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400786/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent, acting in her personal capacity, was the claimant’s employer. It held that the claimant’s claims for unauthorised deductions from earnings and holiday pay were well-founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,859.07 net in owed wages and £1,808.69 net in holiday pay, making a total judgment sum of £3,667.76 net. No separate award components were identified beyond those two sums.
The judgment also provided for payment by instalments of £100 per calendar month, with the last payment to be £67.76, payable on the last Friday of each month starting on 30 May 2025. If any instalment was missed, the balance became payable forthwith.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deductions from earnings well-founded and ordered payment of £1,859.07 net. | Upheld | — | £1,859 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim well-founded and ordered payment of £1,808.69 net. | Upheld | — | £1,809 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,668
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.