Case 1400807/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D D Smith v Sterling Brickwork Contractors Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400807/2021
- Decision date
- 20 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D D Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Dawson recorded that the respondent, Sterling Brickwork Contractors Limited, had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £3,640, calculated as 28 days at £130.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with written particulars of employment pursuant to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. For that failure, the tribunal ordered payment of £2,600, described as 4 weeks at £650. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is £6,240.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,640, calculated as 28 days at £130. | Upheld | — | £3,640 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £2,600, described as 4 weeks at £650. | Upheld | — | £2,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,240
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.