Case 1400812/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Matthews v JEBAH Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400812/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Matthews
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was decided under Rule 21, and the tribunal recorded that the Respondent, JEBAH Limited, had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay Mrs N Matthews the gross sum of £1,127.03 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the Respondent to pay damages in the net sum of £1,657.05 for that breach of contract claim.
In addition, the tribunal found that the Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,308.33. The hearing listed for 11 October 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,127 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,657 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,308 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,092
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.