Case 1400817/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Willcox v Lynda Owen — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400817/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Willcox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Livesey recorded that the respondent, Lynda Owen, had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr C Willcox the gross sum of £400.00 in respect of that deduction.
The judgment also ordered the respondent to provide itemised pay statements for the months of June to November 2019. The extracted text does not set out any further reasoning, findings of fact, or separate monetary award linked to that order.
No discrimination, dismissal, redundancy, whistleblowing, or other substantive employment claim is identified in the extracted text beyond the wage deduction issue and the pay statement order. The judgment is brief and gives no additional legal analysis beyond the Rule 21 disposal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £400.00. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Other | The tribunal ordered the respondent to provide itemised pay statements for the months of June to November 2019. The judgment does not use a specific statutory label for this part of the decision. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.