Mr M James v Forestglade Limited — 2020

Case reference: 1400827/2019
Decision date: 29 May 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Livesey Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M James

Respondent

Forestglade Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Livesey issued the judgment on 29 May 2020. The extracted text states that the claimant withdrew the claim and that the proceedings were dismissed. No findings on liability, causation, or remedy are recorded in the judgment text provided.

The case listing for the matter identifies sex discrimination and unfair dismissal as the underlying categories, but the judgment itself does not set out the factual allegations or conduct any merits analysis of those claims. The only recorded disposition is that the proceedings ended following withdrawal by the claimant.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Sex discrimination	The case listing identifies sex discrimination. The judgment itself records only that the claimant withdrew the claim and that the proceedings were dismissed; no merits findings or remedy were given.	Withdrawn	Sex	—
Unfair dismissal	The case listing identifies unfair dismissal. The judgment itself records only that the claimant withdrew the claim and that the proceedings were dismissed; no merits findings or remedy were given.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.