Case 1400827/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Miss Nicola Homewood v Omnitude Limited — 2021

Case reference: 1400827/2020
Decision date: 3 February 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
Venue: Southampton

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss Nicola Homewood

Respondent

Omnitude Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Rayner heard the case at Southampton on 25 January 2021. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment records claims for notice pay, unpaid wages, unpaid holiday pay and other payments.

The tribunal decided only the time limit issue. It held that those claims were in time because it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to file within the primary time limit and because she filed within a reasonable time thereafter, on 13 January 2020.

The judgment does not record any determination of the merits of the notice pay, unpaid wages, unpaid holiday pay or other payment claims, and it does not award any remedy.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The tribunal found the notice pay claim was in time; the judgment does not determine the merits or award a remedy.	Other	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found the unpaid wages claim was in time; the judgment does not determine the merits or award a remedy.	Other	—	—
Holiday pay	The tribunal found the unpaid holiday pay claim was in time; the judgment does not determine the merits or award a remedy.	Other	—	—
Other	The judgment refers to "other payments" being in time but does not identify the payment type or determine the merits.	Other	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.