Case 1400830/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ms Emma David T/a The Lamb and Flag — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400830/2019
- Decision date
- 18 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment dated 18 July 2019, the tribunal found that the Respondent, Ms Emma David t/a The Lamb and Flag, had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages, had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement, and had breached contract in relation to notice. Each of those claims succeeded.
The tribunal ordered payment of three separate sums: £542.00 for the wages deduction, £1,300.00 for holiday entitlement, and £440.00 for one week's statutory notice pay. The hearing listed for 1 November 2019 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or any broader unfair dismissal remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £542.00. | Upheld | — | £542 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,300.00. | Upheld | — | £1,300 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract in relation to notice and awarded 1 week's statutory notice pay of £440.00. | Upheld | — | £440 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,282
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.