Case 1400832/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ogbon (lay Representative) For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400832/2019
- Decision date
- 11 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Ogbon (lay Representative) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was before Employment Judge Rayner in Southampton on 11 February 2020. The judgment records that the claimant's claim that he had been subjected to detriment in respect of matters before January 2019 for making a public interest disclosure was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The judgment also records that the claimant's indirect discrimination claim on grounds of sex was dismissed on withdrawal, and that his indirect discrimination claim on grounds of race was dismissed on withdrawal. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the judgment text provided.
No remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment, and the decision contains only the disposal of the withdrawn claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claim that the claimant had been subject to detriment in respect of matters before January 2019 for making a public interest disclosure was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the indirect discrimination claim on grounds of sex was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the indirect discrimination claim on grounds of race was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.