Case 1400832/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Parnell v Marchwood Engineering Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400832/2020
- Decision date
- 19 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Parnell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol by video on 4 January 2021 before Employment Judge Livesey. Mr W Parnell appeared with Mr Townend, a friend, and Marchwood Engineering Ltd did not attend. The written judgment records that the claimant's claims of unlawful deductions from wages, unpaid holiday pay and breach of contract succeeded.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £1,000.97 in respect of unlawful deductions from wages, £76.83 in respect of unpaid holiday pay, and £838.85 in respect of breach of contract. The written record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,001 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £77 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £839 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,917
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,917
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.